Keywords
journalism
Ukraine
war
education
crises
OSINT
AI
technologies
How to Cite
Abstract
Introduction. The article analyzes the challenges and new competencies required of journalists reporting on the war in Ukraine warsince 2022, with particular emphasis on the role of digital technologies, OSINT (open-source intelligence) tools, and generative artificial intelligence.
Relevance of the study. In the context of full-scale war, Ukrainian media faced the necessity not only of providing reliable information to the public and countering disinformation, but also of rapidly adapting to new threats such as propaganda, fake news, and deepfakes.
Methodology. The study is based on case analyses of Ukrainian journalists’ activities, the use of digital verification tools, and a review of scientific literature and media materials from 2022–2025. Advanced search techniques and analytical tools such as PinPoint and Notebook LM were employed to identify a catalogue of the most important tools and competencies essential for journalistic work in wartime conditions.
Results. The findings indicate that key skills include the use of open sources, data analysis, fact-checking, and proficiency with AI tools, all while adhering to principles of ethics and information security.
Conclusions. The experiences of Ukrainian media highlight the necessity of continuous journalist education in new technologies and the development of resilience to informational and psychological pressure from adversaries. The article formulates recommendations for journalism education, emphasizing the need to develop a catalogue of digital tools and competencies that will enable the media to maintain standards of reliability and credibility in times of crisis.
References
1. Ivkova, V., and Opirskyi, I. (2025). OSINT-tekhnolohii yak zahroza kiberbezpetsi derzhavy [OSINT technologies as a threat to state cybersecurity]. Kiberbezpeka: osvita, nauka, tekhnika, 3(27), 165–179. DOI: https://doi.org/10.28925/2663-4023.2025.27.749.
2. Kopotun, I., Koropatnik, I., and Mykytiuk, M. (2024). Viiskova zhurnalistyka. Ukrainskyi aspekt. Stanovlennia ukrainskoi viiskovoi zhurnalistyky [Military journalism. The Ukrainian aspect. Formation of Ukrainian military journalism]. Kyiv: [b. v.]. ISBN 978-611-0129-28-2.
3. Likhtanska, A. P., and Mykhailov, V. O. (2024). Vykorystannia OSINT v kryminalnomu pravi Ukrainy [The use of OSINT in the criminal law of Ukraine]. DICTUM FACTUM, 1(15), 105–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32703/2663-6352/2024-1-15-105-111.
4. Maliienko, A., Yakovets, A., and Bondar, Yu. (2022). Zhurnalisty na viini. Dokumentalni doslidzhennia, khronikalnyi litopys, analityka [Journalists at war: Documentary studies, chronicle, analytics]. Kharkiv: [b. v.]. ISBN 978-617-551-122-0.
5. Maliienko, A., Yakovets, A., and Bondar, Yu. (2023). Ukraina. Zhurnalisty na peredovii. Zbirka narysiv i statei [Ukraine. Journalists on the frontline: A collection of essays and articles]. Kyiv: [b. v.]. ISBN 978-617-8259-28-0.
6. Toma, M. H., and Vasylova, O. V. (2025). Instrumenty OSINT: fiksatsiia voiennykh zlochyniv v Ukraini [OSINT tools: recording war crimes in Ukraine]. Zhurnal polityky, prava ta sotsialnykh aktualnykh pytan, 2, 905–909. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2788-6018.2025.02.134.
7. Yarovyi, T. S. (2019). OSINT yak perspektyvnyi instrument kontroliu za lobistskoiu diialnistiu v konteksti derzhavnoi bezpeky [OSINT as a promising tool for monitoring lobbying activities in the context of state security]. Ekspert: paradyhmy yurydychnykh nauk i derzhavnoho upravlinnia, 4(6), 201–208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-9660-2019-4(6)-201-208.
8. A Handbook for Journalism Educators. Reporting on Artificial Intelligence / Ed. by M. Jaakkola. (2023). Paris: UNESCO, pp. 27–36. ISBN 978-92-3-100592-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58338/HSMK8605.
9. Berkeley Protocol on Digital Open Source Investigations: A Practical Guide on the Effective Use of Digital Open Source Information in Investigating Violations of International Criminal, Human Rights and Humanitarian Law. (2022). Retrieved from https://www.ohchr.org/en/publications/policy-and-methodological-publications/berkeley-protocol-digital-open-source (Accessed: 5 November 2025).
10. Block, L. (2023). The long history of OSINT. Journal of Intelligence History, 23(2), 95–109. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/16161262.2023.2224091.
11. Dierickx, L., and Lindén, C. (2024). Screens as battlefields: Fact-checkers’ multidimensional challenges in debunking Russian-Ukrainian war propaganda. Media and Communication, 12, Article 8668. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.8668.
12. García-Marín, D., and Salvat-Martinrey, G. (2023). Desinformación y guerra. Verificación de las imágenes falsas sobre el conflicto ruso-ucraniano. ICONO 14. Revista Científica de Comunicación y Tecnologías Emergentes, 21(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7195/ri14.v21i1.1943.
13. Ghioni, R., Taddeo, M., and Floridi, L. (2024). Open source intelligence and AI: a systematic review of the GELSI literature. AI & Society, 39, 1827–1842. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-023-01628-x.
14. Hwang, Y.-W., Lee, I.-Y., Kim, H., Lee, H., and Kim, D. (2022). Current status and security trend of OSINT. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing, Article ID 1290129, 14 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/1290129.
15. Khan, S. A., Dierickx, L., Furuly, J.-G., Vold, H. B., Tahseen, R., Linden, C.-G., and Dang-Nguyen, D.-T. (2025). Debunking war information disorder: A case study in assessing the use of multimedia verification tools. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 76(5), 752–769. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24970.
16. Magallón-Rosa, R., Fernández-Castrillo, C., and Garriga, M. (2023). Fact-checking in war: Types of hoaxes and trends from a year of disinformation in the Russo-Ukrainian war. Profesional de la información, 32(5), e320520. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2023.sep.20.
17. Morejón-Llamas, N., Martín-Ramallal, P., and Micaletto-Belda, J.-P. (2022). Twitter content curation as an antidote to hybrid warfare during Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. Profesional de la información, 31(3), e310308. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2022.may.08.
18. Nissen, I. A., Walter, J. G., Charquero-Ballester, M., and Bechmann, A. (2022). Digital infrastructures of COVID-19 misinformation: A new conceptual and analytical perspective on fact-checking. Digital Journalism. Retrieved from https://www.tandfonline.com/journals/rdij20 (Accessed: 5 November 2025).
19. Zecchinon, P., and Standaert, O. (2025). The war in Ukraine through the prism of visual disinformation and the limits of specialized fact-checking: A case study at Le Monde. Digital Journalism, 13(1), 61–79. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2024.2332609.
20. Schapals, A. K., and Bruns, A. (2022). Media and Communication, 10(3), 5–16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v10i3.5401.
21. Wohlin, C. (2014). Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE ’14). New York: Association for Computing Machinery, Article 38, pp. 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2601248.2601268.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.